David Chandler – The Physics of the 9/11 Truth Movement

David Chandler is a physics teacher, a Quaker peace activist, and an independent 9/11 researcher, active with Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and on the board of the International Center for 9/11 Studies. He noticed that something was amiss with the way the buildings fell on 9/11 and did precise measurements of the motions associated with the building collapses and straightforwardly applied Newton’s laws of motion to show what this implied about the forces at work.

Chandler thinks that the free fall of the buildings is one of the clearest smoking guns for the use of explosives on 9/11. A paper describing his analysis can be found online at the Journal of 9/11 Studies. Chandler’s’ analysis proves that approximately 90% of the structural support had to have been removed from the North Tower for it to come down with constant downward acceleration as it did. Building 7 (the third building to undergo rapid, total destruction on the evening of 9/11) came down at absolute freefall as well so that also had to have its existing inner structure previously removed. Besides clarifying the dynamics of the building collapses, David Chandler has built a solid case that the official NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology) investigation was an elaborate coverup, involving not just errors, but that it was fraudulent. Chandler is working on a documentary DVD that will tie together all of his work. Go to his website below and the numerous analytical videos posted by him on YouTube for more details.

Link: http://911SpeakOut.org

Advertisements

One thought on “David Chandler – The Physics of the 9/11 Truth Movement

  1. Skyscrapers must hold themselves up and gravity works the same way all over the planet. Physicists should not need structural engineers to tell them that skyscraper designers must figure out how to distribute the steel so as not to put too much steel too high up in the buildings. Skyscrapers must also sway in the wind.

    But this means the building must get stronger and heavier all of the way down. So how does the top 15% by height which had to be less than 15% by mass crush more than 80% that had to be stronger and heavier and accelerate at more than 50% of gravitational acceleration at the same time? To come down in less than 18 seconds that is what the top of north tower had to do.

    Physicists have made themselves look absurd by letting this drag on for 9 years. They must keep high school kids from comprehending Newtonian physics!

    Gravitational Collapse onto Cumulative Supports
    .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s